Replacing (raster_block >> tx_size) with (block >> (tx_size << 1)).
The new expression is much more logical than previous one. Surprisingly both expressions give exactly the same set of dependent values -- have_top, have_left, have_right -- in vp9_predict_intra_block. Change-Id: I63eb1b592b8c37883b3a0dbb1f3daa271e446109
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment