Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b30b2ba2 authored by Ralph Giles's avatar Ralph Giles
Browse files

Try to clarify frame packing.

Marko was concerned that RFC 6716 section 3.2.1 narrowly describes
zero-length DTX frames _only_ for code 2 and 3 packets, and therefore
wanted this sentence to state clearly that code 0 and 1 can be used
with zero-byte frames as well. I've tried to do that.
parent e26ed59a
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -264,6 +264,16 @@ The actual length of each missing Opus frame inside the packet is zero bytes,
as defined in Section&nbsp;3.2.1 of&nbsp;<xref target="RFC6716"/>.
</t>
<t>
Zero-byte frames MAY be packed into packets using any of codes&nbsp;0, 1,
2, or&nbsp;3.
When successive frames have the same configuration, the higher code packings
reduce overhead.
Likewise, if the TOC configuration matches, the muxer MAY further combine the
empty frames with previous or subsequent non-zero-length frames (using
code&nbsp;2 or VBR code&nbsp;3).
</t>
<t>
<xref target="RFC6716"/> does not impose any requirements on the PLC, but this
section outlines choices that are expected to have a positive influence on
......@@ -325,13 +335,6 @@ Since medium-band audio is only supported in the SILK modes, wideband frames
will be able to preserve all of the available audio bandwidth.
</t>
<t>
Matching synthetic TOC byte(s) MAY be packed into packets using any of
codes&nbsp;0, 1, 2, or&nbsp;3.
If the TOC configuration matches, the muxer MAY further combine the empty
frames with previous or subsequent non-zero-length frames (using code&nbsp;2
or VBR code&nbsp;3).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="preskip" title="Pre-skip">
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment